As we discussed previously, the estate
planning process does not end with the signing of the documents. One aspect of
the process that is the client’s responsibility involves discussing planning
with those individuals named to make decisions and potentially with
beneficiaries.
In our practice, we have found that the best plans are ones
where everyone involved knows the plan and there are no surprises. This does
not mean that the client need to discuss every detail of their estate with every
person named in the documents. However, providing those whom the plan most
affects with sufficient information makes execution of the plan significantly
easier.
First, it is important to inform those people who have been designated
to make decisions upon the client’s incapacity. We encourage our clients to
discuss this prior to the signing, therefore avoiding a situation where a named
individual intends to immediately step aside. Talking with your named
designates ensures that all of the individuals named in an estate plan are
willing to act if called upon, and decreases the chance that the probate court
will become involved in naming a successor designee. Additionally, it is
important to inform those designees where those executed documents are kept so
they can be located easily in the event the need to step in arises.
In addition to informing those individuals named as
designees of their potential roles and duties, it is also important to discuss
with these people the client's concerns and desired treatment if called upon to
act. It is important to provide designees with sufficient information regarding
values, beliefs, and wishes so that they are able to make decisions that they
feel are in the client's best interest and reflect decisions that the client would
make were they not incapacitated. Frequently these discussions will touch upon
sensitive topics such as the circumstances under which the decision to withhold
medical treatment is appropriate. Many clients express a reluctance to have
such discussions due to their sensitive nature. If a discussion does not occur,
at a minimum we recommend providing a letter with instructions regarding those
issues. The letter can be kept with the Patient Advocate Designation.
The importance of establishing guidelines for designees is
not limited to those named as Patient Advocate. Should a client become incapacitated,
those who will act on their behalf as Successor Trustees under the Trust and
Attorneys in Fact under the Durable Power of Attorney must also be aware of the
client's overall goals. Both of these roles may involve providing access to
assets for dependents, continuing the client's charitable gifting, and the
operation of the client’s business. If those individuals named are not familiar
with the client’s desires, it makes acting on behalf of the client significantly
more burdensome. Again, the client can provide many of these details in a
separate writing that is kept with the relevant documents. Important
information to be contained in this writing includes specific instructions as
to what should be done with particular assets should the client become
incapacitated, instructions for the continuance or modification of charitable giving,
and instructions regarding the operation of businesses to name a few.
In addition to designees named in documents, others may benefit
from receiving advanced information about the terms of an estate plan.
Providing beneficiaries with information regarding potential inheritances
establishes reasonable expectations and reduces the chances that a beneficiary
will challenge the terms of the estate plan. How much information a client
chooses to give to a beneficiary depends on the family situation. There is no
correct answer to this question, as the right amount of information can vary
significantly from client to client and even from beneficiary to beneficiary.
Where some beneficiaries have sufficient experience and maturity to provide
them with the full details of their potential inheritance, others may misuse
such information and engage in patterns of reckless or irresponsible behavior.
It is been our experience however, that beneficiaries who
are informed of distributions for their benefit in at least general terms create
the least amount of problems following a death. When beneficiaries have an
understanding of the donor's reasoning in making the gifts they make, there is
often less conflict following the death. This is not to say that a discussion
of potential distributions solves all problems. There are individuals who, upon
learning of their share of an estate, will always feel they have been treated
unfairly.
In addition to discussing the specific distributions laid
out in the in the estate plan it is also frequently beneficial for a client to
discuss the distribution of their personal property. By learning which items of
property their loved ones feel will provide a connection to the client after
death, the client is better able to ensure that their loved ones are able to
retain those items and the memories associated with them. When a client
discovers that multiple loved ones have an interest in the same items, it is
possible to head off conflicts by designating particular individuals to receive
particular items so that disputes do not occur following a death, avoiding further
pain during an already difficult time.
Discussing estate planning, medical concerns, and death are
difficult subjects. However like much of the rest of the estate planning
process, by engaging in these discussions while people are healthy and active,
it is possible to avoid a great deal of trouble should a person become
incapacitated or after they have passed away. In our practice, we strive to
provide clients with peace of mind that their loved ones will be cared for
following their death. By encouraging our clients to engage in discussions
regarding their planning we hope to avoid potential pitfalls and awkward
situations as well as additional grief, strife, or problems after a client's death.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We welcome and appreciate your comments but remind you that while not all viewpoints are equally respectable, all people should be treated with respect. The authors do not actively moderate comments but reserve the right to remove comments that are offensive, derogatory, or contain spam.