Estate Planning Opportunities Created by the New Tax Law

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“The Act”) passed by Congress and signed by the President at the end of last year included significant changes in the Estate and Gift tax provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that open planning opportunities for limited time. For clients looking to insure their estates take advantage of every opportunity it is now time to review whether more advanced planning strategies are appropriate.

With the adoption of the Act, Congress changed the Estate, Gift, and Generation-Skipping Transfer (GST) tax exemptions under the Internal Revenue Code. The prior law exempted the first $5 million (as adjusted for inflation in years after 2011) of transferred property for each taxpayer from Estate and Gift Tax. This allowed a married couple a total exemption of  $10.9 million of assets in 2017.

Under the new law, for estates of decedents dying and for gifts made during lifetime after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, the exclusion amount is doubled from $5 million to $10 million (again as adjusted for inflation occurring after 2011) and is expected to be approximately $11.2 million per person or $22.4 million per married couple in 2018. The Act does not make changes to the tax rates for Estate, Gift, and GST, which remain subject to a maximum tax rate of 40 percent. Additionally, the current basis step-up under Code §1014 for property inherited from a decedent remains in place.

Despite the early discussions regarding the Act, it is important to note that there is no provision in the final legislation for ultimate repeal of the Estate, Gift, or GST taxes, and the increased exemptions remain in place only until December 31, 2025, at which time they revert to the current $5 million level (indexed for inflation).  These circumstances open a significant, once in-a-lifetime opportunity for clients with estates above the above the exemption limits to protect more assets from taxation. Some clients may be tempted to take a wait and see attitude given that the new limits do not expire until December 31, 2025, but delaying this discussion comes at their peril as the tax legislation may be modified significantly if the 2018 midterm elections or 2020 Presidential election bring changes in the control of Congress and the White House. In addition, although death is inevitability, none of us knows when, so planning is important.

The tax changes, when combined with valuation discounting, open the door for strategies that can shield significant assets from Estate and Gift taxation through the use of direct gifts, gifts in trust, and gifts of business interests (such as family partnerships, LLCs and corporations). Such gifts will also shift future appreciation of the assets to children and grandchildren, who may also be in lower tax brackets for income tax purposes. It is also possible to make use of legislation adopted in 2017 by the Michigan legislature to create self-settled trusts which are likely to provide creditor protection and allow clients to take advantage of the higher exemptions. 

While clients may initially be reluctant to make larger gifts immediately, a review of the options and strategies to protect assets from Gift or Estate tax while still providing some control of the assets should be considered immediately. As always, the tax rules are complex and retaining attorneys experienced in complex estate planning is important because errors in implementation of sophisticated strategies can be very costly if done incorrectly.

Al and Matt

'Tis the Season for Gifting

Since restarting the blog we have focused primarily on basic estate planning concepts, explaining the various documents and how they work together to create a plan to address the uncertain and unexpected changes that come along during life. Over the next few blogs we are going to move into some more complex planning issues and address how they can be part of an estate plan. In the spirit of the season, we will start with the topic of gifting.

Any time of the year, but especially during the holiday season, clients often consider how they can help their loved ones by gifting cash or other property to them. Obviously the inclination to gift is important, but in the context of estate planning, gifting is generally associated with the tax implications of transferring assets, be it money, real estate, business interests, or any other property. The tax implications of gifting are a pressing issue because the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) imposes a Gift Tax on any gifts above a certain level.
The Code treats gifts during lifetime and at death in a similar manner considering them both transfers of wealth that may be taxable if the gifts exceed a certain value. The general rule is the Code imposes a tax on the transfer of wealth, but there are a number of exceptions to the general rule. First, gifts to a spouse are not taxed, unless the donee spouse is not a U.S. citizen. Second, gifts to anyone (relatives or otherwise) to pay for education or medical services are also exempt from gift tax as long as those gifts are paid directly to the school or provider. Third, there is an “Annual Exclusion” amount that allows a person to make as many gifts as they want, to as many people as they want, as long as the total gifts to a single person in a year are under a certain amount known as the Annual Exclusion (currently $14,000.00 and rising to $15,000.00 in 2018).

If a gift to any one person exceeds the value of that Annual Exclusion it counts against the giver’s Unified Credit which can be used during lifetime or at death. The Unified Credit translates into an “Exclusion Amount” which is currently $5,450,000.00 and set to rise to $5,600,000.00 in 2018. The Exclusion Amount can be used to protect transfers at death from Estate Tax or gifts during lifetime from Gift Tax. Each dollar of the Exclusion Amount used by a person during their life reduces their Exclusion Amount at death. If a married person does not use their full Exclusion Amount during lifetime or against Estate Tax at death their surviving spouse can add any unused portion of that Exclusion Amount to their own Exclusion Amount. The result of all of these exclusions is that a married couple can give away in excess of $11,000,000.00 in their lifetime without ever paying any tax on those gifts, which currently make the Gift Tax a very low impact tax, except in the case of high net worth individuals. Congress is currently debating changes in estate and gift taxation. If changes become law, we will discuss this then.

Because for the majority of the population has little worry about making taxable gifts, why is gifting a concern in estate planning? In our experience, issues with gifts revolve more around the personal impact of gifts to the donee rather than the legal impact. People commonly express concerns about gifting different amounts to different children, the impact of making gifts to children who may not make good use of the assets, their own financial security if they choose to make gifts, and the impact of gifting on other aspects of planning, including Medicaid. The stress and anxiety of these questions frequently outweighs a person’s concern about writing a check or turning over control of another asset.

When assisting clients navigating these issues we focus first on the client and ensure that the gifting is both the client’s desire and that the gift will not have a negative impact on the client, either currently or long-term. We remind our clients that they worked hard to accumulate the assets they have and that they should not give away anything that would result in a negative impact to their own lifestyle. Once the client is comfortable their own needs are taken care of, we can then discuss with them their particular situation on how to make gifts to assist loved ones, yet attach strings to protect against the known failings of those loved ones.

It is possible to use Trusts to make gifts to children or grandchildren, but place limits on the use of those gifts and also protect those gifts from creditor problems. One can also structure an intra-family loan that uses gifting to return loan payments to children at the end of the year (or simply provide children with the funds to make the loan payments). It is possible to structure the terms of a Living Trust to take into account gifts made to beneficiaries during lifetime and offset distributions from the Living Trust by the value of the lifetime gifts so that children ultimately receive the same distributions whether during their parent’s life or at death.

Gift planning, as with any other type of tax planning, should never let the “tax tail wag the dog”. By this we mean while it is important to consider the tax ramifications of the gift, it is more important to make sure the gift makes sense after a sound analysis, and then consider strategies enabling the avoidance of taxation. As we always stress, working with an attorney experienced in the legal obstacles and solutions is critical to avoiding mistakes and unanticipated consequences.

Matt and Al

Tax Reform "Framework"

     Following in the footsteps of the recently released estimates of the 2018 inflation adjusted exemptions for the Estate and Gift Taxes, yesterday the President unveiled what the White House refers to as a "framework" for tax reform. This framework contains a number of significant proposals, many of which are similar to ideas put forward during the President's campaign including:

• reducing the number of individual income tax brackets from 7 to 3,

• nearly doubling the current standard deduction,

• increasing the child tax credit to an unspecified higher level, 

• significantly reducing the corporate income tax rate, and

• reducing the tax rate on income received from "pass-through" companies (such as LLC's, partnerships, and S-corps).

Also significant in the framework is a renewed effort to reduce individual and corporate tax deductions and repeal the Estate and Gift Tax.

     Economists, pundits, and reporters will have much to say about this effort to reform the tax code, but for our purposes it is important to remember that this framework is essentially a “wish list’ and not a well-defined bill Congress can discuss and pass. The framework omits significant details, including basic, but integral, information such as where the individual bracket thresholds start and stop. While this is clearly a statement of intent regarding how the administration would like to move forward on tax reform, the lack of specifics make it little more than a compilation of common Republican talking points on the subject of tax reform from the last 10 years.

     From our point of view, any discussion of tax reform is an important issue to stay abreast of in order to understand how it will impact our clients planning. The potential repeal of Estate and Gift Taxes reinforces this belief, as any change of that magnitude is likely to create a ripple effect reaching other aspects of the tax code, including whether inheritors receive a step up in basis and the rules regarding the distribution of inherited IRAs. That said, it is our philosophy to keep track of tax proposals but not to spend a significant amount of time gazing into our crystal ball to determine how proposed legislation that may never come to pass will affect our clients.

     Rest assured we will continue to stay abreast of tax proposals and their impact on the planning landscape so that if and when a tax reform proposal becomes law we will be prepared to provide our clients with the expertise necessary to adapt their planning to the changed landscape and ensure that it continues to achieve their goals moving forward.

Alan and Matt

Changes to Gift Tax Exclusions for 2018

Bloomberg and Thomson Reuters released their predictions for 2018’s inflation-adjusted figures related to the Unified Estate and Gift Tax Exclusion amount and the Annual Gift Tax Exclusion this week. While these are not final numbers released by the IRS, they are likely to reflect the 2018 increases.

For gifts made and estates of decedents dying in 2018, the Estate and Gift Tax exclusion amount will likely increase to $5,600,000 (up from $5,490,000 for gifts made and estates of decedents dying in 2017). This increase raises the threshold for Estate and Gift Tax liability to $11,200,000 for married couples.

For gifts made in 2018, the Annual Gift Tax Exclusion will also likely increase to $15,000  per person (up from $14,000 for gifts made in 2017).

Finally, the Exemption from Generation-Skipping Tax (GST) is will likely increase to $5,600,000 for transfers in 2018 (up from $5,490,000 for transfers in 2017).

These increases will allow clients to make further use of planning strategies which allow them to reduce their tax liability by making gifts during their lifetime. Feel free to call or email us if you have any questions or if you want to discuss planning strategies.

Alan & Matt

Window Closing on Discounts for Intra-family Gifts

We've been quiet for a couple of weeks, something we intend to avoid in the future, however today's blog addresses the Proposed Regulations announced yesterday by the Treasury Department and the IRS with respect to the ability to claim a discounted valuation for Intra-family gifts. If you or your clients are considering transferring partial ownership of a family business on to children it may be beneficial to do so sooner, rather than later.

In previous blogs we discussed the strategy of using a Family Limited Partnership or Family L.L.C. to transfer interests in either family owned businesses or other types of assets, such as real estate, to children while allowing parents to retaining control of the entity during their lifetime. A major benefit of such transfers is the ability of the parent to claim a significant discount in the valuation of the transferred assets for the purposes of Gift Tax liability. On Tuesday August 2, 2016, the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service announced Proposed Regulations that address this strategy and, if put into effect as written, will significantly reduce the ability of family business owners to take advantage of this strategy.

Under current regulations, it is possible for a parent to transfer interests in a family business to the other family members while retaining operational control of those businesses. The transferred interest does not contain voting rights and specifically indicates that the family member does not have the right to sell or otherwise alienate the interest. The lack of control over the operation of the business and inability to sell the interest reduces the value of the interest and allows for a discount in the value for purposes of gifting. This discount allows the client to transfer a greater value of assets to their loved ones at a lesser cost for gift tax purposes. When it has challenged transfers of this nature in court, the IRS has consistently argued against the size of the discounts. 

The Proposed Regulations generally provide that if a parent transfers an interest in a corporation that the parent controls to any other member of the family any "applicable restriction" shall be disregarded in valuing the transferred interest. The Internal Revenue Code defines “applicable restriction” as “any restriction that effectively limits the ability of the entity to liquidate, but which, after the transfer, either in whole or in part, will lapse or may be removed by the transferor or any member of the transferor’s family, either alone or collectively.” In plain English, the Proposed Regulation provides that if a parent transfers an interest in a family owned business to their child with the restriction that the child cannot alienate their interest in the business without the parent’s permission, that restriction is ignored for purposes of valuing the transferred interest. The removal of such restrictions from consideration in valuing the interests transferred will have a significant impact on the strategy of transferring interests in family owned businesses.

While the Proposed Regulations will significantly limit the valuation discount available to clients when making transfers of family-owned businesses, it does not entirely eliminate the benefits of such transfers. Until these regulations go into effect and are tested in real-world situations, it is unclear what level of discount the IRS will argue is reasonable with respect to other restrictions placed on interests transferred to children that do not relate to the child's ability to alienate the interest. Additionally the strategy of transferring minority or non-controlling interests in family businesses to children is still very beneficial, especially when those business interests contain assets that are likely to appreciate significantly in coming years. Such transfers are also still relevant in the context of succession planning for family businesses, as an equity interest in the family business is often necessary to ensure that future generations are fully invested in the operation of that business before they are given control of the company.

There is still an opportunity to take advantage of the valuation discount, but the window for doing so may be closing. Before these Proposed Regulations can go into effect they must first go through a 90-day public comment period, after which there may be changes, but even if there are no changes, portions of the regulations will not take effect until 30 days after the government issues a final version of the regulations.

The strategy of using a Family L.L.C. to obtain a discount in the valuation of assets transferred to children is a complex legal strategy that business owners should not attempt without consulting an attorney and accountant who are familiar with the process. Avoiding significant issues with the IRS in implementing this strategy requires sound valuations of the business and working with advisors familiar with the process of justifying such valuations. If you have additional questions, concerns, or interest in discussing whether this strategy may be appropriate for your circumstances, or the circumstances of one of your clients, we encourage you to contact us quickly, as the time available to take advantage of this strategy is very limited.

Alan and Matt

Gifting $5 Million Without Using $5 Million Worth of Lifetime Exemptions

A few weeks ago we discussed the concept of using limited liability companies ("LLC's") for gifting purposes. We have been working with clients using such a strategy and this gives us an opportunity to explain how the concept works.

     Among other assets, John and Jane have commercial buildings valued at $10,000,000, which are likely to double in value over the next 10 years. The clients also have two children and six grandchildren, all of whom are adults. They were not opposed to lifetime gifting to remove assets and the future appreciation from their estates, but they wanted to maintain control of the assets.

     We suggested that John and Jane transfer the buildings to an LLC, in exchange for a 2% voting interest in the LLC and a 98% nonvoting interest in the LLC, which they then divided equally between themselves. We then discussed what portion of the interests they wanted to gift to their children and grandchildren. Since one goal was to ensure that John and Jane maintained control of the buildings, they will definitely retain ownership of the voting interests. They also wanted to enjoy some of the annual income generated by the buildings, so they will need to retain a portion of the nonvoting interests. Ultimately, John and Jane chose to gift 50% of the nonvoting interests to their children and grandchildren.

     Since John and Jane gifted nonvoting interests, which do not give the owner of that interest control of the business, the IRS will allow a discount of the value of the interest gifted for gift tax purposes. Thus, even though John and Jane gifted an equivalent of $5,000,000, because of the discount (conservatively at 20%) the deemed gift was only $4,000,000. John and Jane each used their annual exclusion gifts of $14,000 to make gifts to each of the children and grandchildren, for a total of $224,000 ($14,000 x 2 grantors x 8 descendants). The remaining gift of $3,776,000 was divided equally between John and Jane's lifetime exemptions against estate tax and we filed a gift tax return providing the IRS with a record of the transaction.

    As an additional protection against creditors and any potential divorce, we also established irrevocable trusts for each of John and Jane’s children and grandchildren to hold the gifted nonvoting interests. These trusts have flexible provisions regarding the distribution of income and principal to the beneficiaries, while also creating a nest egg for later in their lives. 

     The net result of this strategy is that John and Jane maintain control of the buildings during their lifetime and removed assets presently valued at $5,000,000 from their estates using only a portion of their lifetime exemptions. In addition, the transfer removes all of the appreciation on the gifts from John and Jane's estates, saving approximately $2,000,000 of estate taxes at their deaths (appreciation of $5,000,000 x 40% estate tax). In addition, income earned by the gifted interests is now reported on eight different income tax returns and presumably taxed at lower tax rates.

     In this situation, an estate tax savings was one of the desired results. However, even if clients do not have an estate tax issue, gifts of LLC interests to irrevocable trusts can provide children and grandchildren with an income stream, while protecting the interests from creditors or possible marital issues. This strategy is not without additional cost, as appraisals of both the asset value and the minority discount must be completed by a qualified appraiser. In addition, attention must be paid to the administrative requirements and tax filings of both the LLC and the irrevocable trust. As always, clients should seek the advice of a qualified professional before engaging in the strategy.

Using LLCs to Expand Lifetime Gifting

So far, our discussion regarding the use of gifting an estate plan has revolved primarily around cash gifts, it is important to understand that gifts can consist of any type of property, including interests in real estate and business entities. A family owned Limited Liability Company is an excellent tool for transferring a variety of assets from one generation to the next, often at a reduced value, while allowing parents to retain control of the assets during their lifetime.

     While the use of cash gifts provides clients with a tool for reducing their potential estate tax liability, clients may be able to gain greater benefits through by using a Limited Liability Company (LLC) in their estate planning. The client can establish an LLC with two classes of Membership Interest, voting and nonvoting, and can retain control over assets by keeping the voting interests and gifting the nonvoting interests to beneficiaries..

     To make use of this gifting strategy, clients first establish a LLC (or modify an existing LLC) with a 1% Voting Member Interest and a 99% Nonvoting Member Interest. This allows the owner of the 1% Voting Member Interest to control the company regardless of who owns the 99% Nonvoting Member Interest. Clients then transfer ownership of other assets, such as real estate or business interests, to the LLC. Now the client is able to make gifts of the Nonvoting Member Interest, without giving up control of the assets. This allows clients to begin transferring highly appreciating assets during their lifetime, reducing any potential estate tax liability because the appreciation of the assets is now out of the Estate, and providing a potential source of income to their loved ones. Clients can transfer these  Nonvoting Member Interests in the LLC using either their lifetime estate exemption and/or their annual gift tax exemption, further reducing potential tax liability. These nonvoting member interests can be given to adult children as well as minor children and grandchildren, with trust holding the interest for these minors. These trusts can then be used to provide funds for education for the minors as income is distributed from the LLCs

     Another benefit of including an LLC in an estate plan is the potential to receive a valuation discount when making gifts of Nonvoting Member Interests. The IRS recognizes that a member interest in an LLC which does not allow the owner control over the company and which restricts the owner's ability to sell or transfer the member interest has less value than an unrestricted interest. Thus, a properly structured LLC may allow clients to transfer larger portions of the Nonvoting Member Interest as part of an annual gifting plan. While using an LLC in this manner is a well-established practice, it is important to acknowledge that without proper appraisals and planning, and such transfers may be subject to IRS scrutiny.

     In order to comply with the law and IRS regulations is important to manage and operate the family-owned LLC as a separate entity, and not just an extension of the client’s own affairs. The LLC should not contain all of the client assets, especially not the client’s residence, because the IRS argues that the LLC is necessary to maintain the client’s lifestyle and therefore, under estate tax rules, the IRS may deem the LLC's assets part of the client’s estate.

     For many clients the use of an LLC as part of their estate planning is an excellent strategy to increase the value of annual gifting. It is also an excellent tool for transferring ownership of family-run businesses to the next generation while ensuring that the clients retain control of the business operation. It is important to remember that this is a complex planning technique that clients should not attempt without consulting qualified professionals for assistance in reviewing the tax and legal implications.

Gifting Strategies for Medical and Education Expenses

     As we touched on in our last blog, many strategies exist for using gifting as part of an estate plan. Today’s blog addresses some of the simpler planning opportunities available through gifting. In future blogs we will focus on the more sophisticated strategies.

     Tuesday’s blog discussed the Annual Gift Tax Exclusion, but it is important to note is that there is another, unlimited Gift Tax exclusion permitted for amounts paid by one individual in two circumstances:

1. On behalf of another individual directly to a qualifying educational organization as tuition for that other individual.
2. On behalf of another individual directly to a provider of medical care as payment for that medical care.

     A "qualifying educational organization" is one that normally maintains a regular faculty and curriculum and normally has a regularly enrolled body of pupils or students in attendance at the place where it regularly carries on educational activites. It can be a primary or secondary school, including a vocational high school, college, university, or a normal, technical, mechanical school and similar institutions. . The Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") permits an unlimited exclusion for tuition expenses of full-time or part-time students paid directly to the qualifying educational organization providing the education. The Code does not permit an unlimited exclusion for amounts paid for books, supplies, dormitory fees, board, or other similar expenses that do not constitute direct tuition costs.

     "Qualifying medical expenses" are limited to those expenses defined in Code §213(d), but include expenses incurred for the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of disease, or for the purpose of affecting any structure or function of the body or for transportation primarily for and essential to medical care. In addition, the unlimited exclusion from the Gift Tax includes amounts paid for medical insurance on behalf of any individual. The unlimited exclusion from the Gift Tax does not apply to reimbursement for amounts paid for medical care by an individual. 

     While contributions to a qualified tuition program, such as a §529 plan do not qualify for the tuition exclusion above, they do enjoy treatment as a "present gift" that can qualify for the gift tax annual exclusion (currently $14,000 per year). The rules also allow the taxpayer electively to spread the contributions made in a single year over a five-year period. This means that grandparents can make a gift of $70,000 each ($14,000 times 5 years) to a §529 plan for a grandchild, for a total of $140,000 in one year, essentially "frontloading" a grandchild's education and allowing for a greater appreciation of the account. These gifts remove funds from the grandparents' estates, saving estate taxes on their deaths.  

     By using these gifting strategies, individuals can help their loved ones currently and reduce possible future estate taxation. Next week we will start discussing some of the sophisticated strategies used to increase the benefits of lifetime gifting in estate tax planning. 

Understanding the Estate and Gift Taxes

     One of the most misunderstood areas of estate planning involves the impact of Federal Estate and Gift Taxes. While most people understand they pay Federal Estate Tax on inherited assets and Federal Gift Tax on gifts made, few people truly understand what creates liability for these taxes and who is responsible for paying them.

     The first point to understand is that Federal Gift and Estate taxes are integrated into a single transfer tax under a unified rate schedule and with a unified credit that imposes a single tax on transfers during life and at death. The Internal Revenue Service group gifts and inherited assets together for purposes of determining total tax owed and the amount of assets excludable before payment of either Federal Gift or Estate taxes

     Let us begin with the Estate Tax. The estate of a deceased individual pays Estate Tax on the assets transferred to non-spouses at the individual's death. The estate tax rate is a sliding scale that tops out at 40%.  The Tax Code includes an Exclusion, which currently allows an estate to transfer $5,430,000.00 before incurring any Estate Tax liability. In addition to this large Exclusion, the Tax Code provides that any assets transferred to a surviving spouse are exempt from tax liability. In addition, any portion of the Exclusion that the estate of the first to die of a married couple does not use can be used by the surviving spouse's estate at his or her death. This ability, commonly known as Portability, means that a married couple will need to transfer nearly $11,000,000.00 at death before paying any Estate Tax. The Tax Code ties the Exclusion amount to the cost of living and therefore each year the Exclusion grows allowing ever-greater tax-free transfers.

     A person can choose to make gifts during lifetime instead of making bequests at death, making Gift Tax an important consideration. The person making the gift is liable for paying the Gift tax, if any is due. As indicated above, Gift and Estate taxes are integrated into a single transfer tax, so that the exclusion from tax becomes a "lifetime exclusion" rather than an exclusion at death. Any exclusion used during lifetime against Gift taxes will reduce the exclusion available against Estate taxes. 

     As noted above, we offset any Gift Tax against the Lifetime Exclusion before any tax becomes due. There is also another exclusion against Gift Tax--the "Annual Exclusion. A The Annual Exclusion on Gift Taxes allows any person to give up to $14,000 to any number of people, each year without creating any Gift tax liability. This means that a husband and wife together can give the each of their three children and their spouses $28,000 each year, reducing the parents' taxable estate by $168,000 each year without paying any tax on those transfers, and without using the Lifetime Exclusion. If our couple wanted to give their children additional amounts in a year, every dollar over $14,000 per beneficiary then reduces the parent’s Lifetime Exclusion.

     As an example, if the parents want to make a $200,000 gift to each of their three children so that the children can purchase a home, the parents can give a total of $28,000 to each child and $28,000 to each child’s spouse tax-free using the Annual Exclusion. The remaining $432,000 in gifts to the children and their spouses will reduce each of the parent's Lifetime Exclusion by $216,000 and reduce their remaining Estate Tax Exclusion by the same amount.

     In estate planning, we employ strategies that can increase the benefit of each of these Exclusions for people able to make substantial gifts. We will discuss some of these in our next blogs. 

Making the Most out of Year End Gifts to Family

This time of year, many of our clients begin considering making gifts to family members. Some of our clients will use the annual gift-tax exclusion ($14,000 in 2013), to make family gifts tax-free. Others, who desire to make larger gifts to family members, are willing to use of a portion of their lifetime exclusion amount (totaling $5,250,000 in 2013).

Many of our clients attempt to keep things simple by giving cash. "Cash makes no enemies" as they say, but it still can remove a significant amount of assets from a client's estate in the event of future estate tax liability. For example, a couple I represent, who will have a taxable estate, give $14,000 each to a total of 33 children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren, as well as to spouses of some of those beneficiaries. Each year they give away more than $900,000, which will save over $360,000 in federal estate tax liability at their death. I suggested the clients give interests in LLCs holding real estate rather cash because it would have allowed them to give away more than $1,100,000 under their current gifting scheme. Unfortunately, many of their beneficiaries have gotten used to living outside of their means and need these cash gifts to help balance out their annual expenses.

As I mentioned above, clients can get even greater advantage against future tax liability by using the annual exclusion gifts to give highly appreciating property rather than cash. The current value of the gift and any future appreciation escapes taxation. Giving children a portion of real estate or minority interests in closely held companies are two common methods of taking advantage of this technique. In addition, it is possible to discount gifts or a minority interest for gift tax purposes because of lack of marketability and lack of control. For example, using a 20% discount allows clients to treat a gift of minority interest valued $18,000 as a gift valued at $14,000. Depending upon the asset the clients choose to transfer, sometime greater discounts are possible.

Others of my clients have taken advantage of the possibility of discounts by giving awayclosely held stock or minority interests in LLCs, which may hold real estate or other invested assets. Can clients not only leverage the annual exclusion gifts, but also can actually leverage the lifetime estate tax and gift exclusion. If there is a desire, a client can make gifts above the annual exclusion amount by using some or all of their lifetime exclusion. If only a 20% valuation discount is available, the current $5,250,000 lifetime exclusion could support gifts of over $6,500,000, not including future appreciation. One client in particular gave away a 99% nonvoting interest in an LLC holding real estate that is leased by his other businesses. Not only were we able to use discounts because the interest was nonvoting, but his retained 1% voting interest allows him to control the entity. This particular client did not need the income from the leases so we structured the LLC to distribute that income to the children. Another client used a similar strategy and distributed income to his grandchildren for their education expenses.

Even if the clients do not have a taxable estate, making gifts to children may be a good idea because it allows them to see if their children will use or invest the money wisely. If the children make mistakes with small amounts, they can modify their estate planning documents to provide guidance to children after their deaths so assets are not wasted. In addition, it can allow them to enjoy seeing their children do things and have things while they are still alive.

Any time during the year is a good time to make gifts to help facilitate planning, but as the days grow short and the year nears an end, there is a finite amount of time for clients to take advantage of gifting opportunities using the annual exclusion gifts or lifetime exclusion gifts. It is important for us as planners to help clients understand the opportunities and facilitate good planning. We need to remind them that if an annual exclusion gift is not made in any particular year, it lapses and cannot be carried over to a following year.

This time of year is also an excellent time for clients to consider charitable gifts, and next week we will discuss some of the planning opportunities for charitable donations.

Alan Ferrara and Matt Ferrara

2014 Inflation Adjusted Tax Limits

     As you are aware, a number of tax figures are adjusted each year for inflation. The Government has released Inflation adjusted 2014 figures for Estate and Trust Tax brackets and other Transfer Tax items. The adjustments are based on the average Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the 12-month period ending the previous August 31. The August 2013 CPI has been released by the Labor Department, and using the CPI for August 2013, (and the preceding 11 months) some of the tax figure adjustments for 2014 are: 

• Unified estate and gift tax exclusion amount. For gifts made and estates of decedents dying in 2014, the exclusion amount will be $5,340,000 (up from $5,250,000 for gifts made and estates of decedents dying in 2013).
• Generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax exemption. The exemption from GST tax will be $5,340,000 for transfers in 2014 (up from $5,250,000 for transfers in 2013).
• Gift tax annual exclusion. For gifts made in 2014, the gift tax annual exclusion will be $14,000 (same as for gifts made in 2013).
• Determining 2% portion for interest on deferred estate tax. In determining the part of the estate tax that is deferred on a farm or closely-held business that is subject to interest at a rate of 2% a year, for decedents dying in 2014, the tentative tax will be computed on $1,450,000 (up from $1,430,000 for 2013) plus the applicable exclusion amount.
• Increased annual exclusion for gifts to noncitizen spouses. For gifts made in 2014, the annual exclusion for gifts to noncitizen spouses will be $145,000 (up from $143,000 for 2013).
• Kiddie tax. The exemption from the kiddie tax for 2014 will be $2,000 (same as for 2013). A parent will be able to elect to include a child's income on the parent's return for 2014 if the child's income is more than $1,000 and less than $10,000 (same as for 2013).
• 2014 Estates and Trust tax rate brackets:

If taxable income is                                                                       The tax is:

Not over $2,500..................................................................................... 15% of taxable income

Over $2,500 but not over $5,800........................$375.00 plus 25% of the excess over $2,500

Over $5,800 but not over $8,900.................... $1,200.00 plus 28% of the excess over $5,800
Over $8,900 but not over $12,150...................$2,068.00 plus 33% of the excess over $8,900
Over $12,150..............................................$3,140.50 plus 39.6% of the excess over $12,150

Alan Ferrara

Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts as a Tool for Wealth Transfer

We often discuss the benefits of including Living Trusts as part of an estate plan, but there are other types of trusts that may provide our clients with significant benefits as part of a larger estate plan, depending upon the client’s particular situation.

A Grantor Retained Annuity Trust (GRAT) is one method for wealthy clients to maintain an income stream for a period of time yet transfer property (often which is highly appreciating) to a child with minimal gift or estate tax. A GRAT consists of assets transferred into an irrevocable trust with the transferor retaining the right to annuity payments for a fixed term of years or their lifetime. If income earned by the trust assets is insufficient to cover the annual payment, the Trustee will make the required payments from principal. When the set time period ends, the remainder of the trust, including any appreciation, can go to a named beneficiary. Alternatively, it is possible to structure the GRAT to return the principal and a certain amount of income to the grantor, and distribute the excess income to the remainder beneficiary.

The gift tax value of the transferred assets is determined at the time of trust creation and funding by subtracting the value of the annuity interest from the fair market value of the assets transferred to the trust. The value of the annuity interest will depend on the interest rate used, the value received by the grantor, and the value of the remainder beneficiaries’ interest. The IRS Regulations set rules for determining what interest rates may be used in the calculation of valuations, especially when family members are involved.

As an example, if a 60-year-old client sets up a GRAT to last two years and uses the following provisions:

• Contributed Asset Value: $1,000,000,
• the §7520 interest rate required by IRS Regulations: 2%, 
• the asset earns 5% per year
• the asset appreciates at 5% per year 

Over the term of the Trust, the client will receive two annual payments of approximately $515,000, and the remainder beneficiary will receive approximately $130,000 remaining in the GRAT with no gift tax cost. If the asset is anticipated to appreciate faster than 5% per year, the benefit to remainder beneficiaries is even greater

Since the GRAT permits payment of both income and trust principal to satisfy the annuity payments, it is important to treat the GRAT as a grantor trust for income tax purposes. This means the client retains liability for taxes on income and realized gains on trust assets even if these amounts are greater than the trust's annuity payments. This further enhances this tool's effectiveness as a family wealth-shifting and estate tax saving device because the client pays the income tax, thus reducing the their estate.

         In the right circumstances, the GRAT can be a powerful tool to transfer assets with minimal gift or estate tax consequences, but clients should carefully review their financial situation with both an experienced attorney and financial advisor before entering into such a transaction.

Alan Ferrara

Keeping a Vacation Home in the Family

A number of my clients have family vacation homes or cottages that they and their children have enjoyed for many years. After getting so much enjoyment from owning the cottage those clients often ask how they can set up their estate planning documents to ensure that when they die, that ownership experience passes onto their children and grandchildren. While, in theory, this may be a good idea, it often creates significant problems if a not fully thought out and planned.

One issue that often causes an issue is the gift tax consequence of transferring a valuable piece of property. However, because of the most recent tax legislation, most people have a sufficient exemption amount so that gift tax is not an issue.

Transferring cottages to other family members can create thornier issues because of personal relationships. While family members may have enjoyed their time at the cottage, for many reasons they may have no interest in owning the cottage with their siblings or other family members. Issues that can arise include:

1. What is the most efficient manner of ownership of the cottage?
2. How to insure that the cottage remains in the "family"?
3. How to establish rules for the management and use of the cottage?

Generally, traditional forms of joint ownership, such as tenancy in common and joint tenancy with rights of survivorship, are inefficient methods for family ownership of the cottage. The primary risk in these types of ownership is that over time the ownership interest is subdivided or fractionalized as it is passed down to subsequent generations. While it is the dream or wish of the parents that the children continue to enjoy the cottages they have in the past, as family members grow into adulthood they may have different ideas. A family member might not have had a great experience at the cottage, may live too far away to be able to enjoy it, cannot afford the share of the cottage expenses, or may simply prefer the value of the cottage in cash to use as they may choose. With tenancy in common or joint tenancy, a family member may try to use his or her partition rights under state law, forcing the sale of the cottage or vacation home.

Co-ownership of the cottage may lead to other conflicts, such as:

1. Who controls the operation of the cottage?
2. How are operating, maintenance or repair expenses shared?
3. Who determines when and what improvements to make and how to pay for those improvements?
4. How are the most desired dates for cottage use determined or allocated among family members?
5. Are pets allowed?
6. Can family members rent their time to third parties?
7. Are nonfamily members, such as spouses and siblings, allowed to own an interest in the vacation home?
8. What happens if a family member wants to sell his interest in the cottage?

While many of these issues do not exist while the parents are alive because the parents pay all expenses of the cottage and determine how it is used, after the death of parents, these issues and others can create family disagreements or even permanent rifts.

 If the parents are still interested in trying to establish a "family cottage," a limited liability company (LLC) is an ideal ownership vehicle. An LLC has a perpetual existence. Parents can transfer the property to an LLC and then gift interests in the LLC during lifetime or at death to other family members. The LLC as an entity can protect owners from lawsuits by users of the cottage if injured on the premises. It can also prevent owners from being able to use the right of partition in order to sell the property. If used with a properly structured operating agreement, it can promote shared use and fair governance of the property.

It is possible to use an LLC operating agreement to meet the goals of the family, and should include:

1. A determination of who is the manager of the LLC--all members or a named managing member.
2. A procedure for determining what maintenance or improvement is to occur on the property and a method of allocating associated expenses.
3. A method of equitably allocating among family members the dates for using the cottage, especially during holidays, school vacations and most ideal seasons.
4. Rules for members using the cottage, including restrictions on allowance of pets, ability to invite guests, and the ability to rent out the member's time to outside parties.
5. A method for penalizing a member for violation of usage rules and/or failure to pay the required contribution for expenses.
6. A method for determining the transfer of member interests, including price and terms, for any member desiring to sell their interest. This could include a restriction on any sale to a non-family member.

While gift and estate taxes are unlikely to cause an issue, the consequences in regards to property taxes should not be forgotten when considering the transfer of a vacation home. Under Michigan law, if you convey less than 50% of ownership in real estate to others, there is no change in the property tax assessment rules for determining taxable value. Parents can gift up to 49% of the property to family members without any real estate tax consequence. If they prefer, the parents can first transfer the property to an LLC and then transfer 50% of the LLC to family members.

Because property values are still somewhat depressed, this is an opportune time to transfer the vacation property to family members and move value and future appreciation to family members and out of the parents' estate, while continuing to allow parents to maintain control of the asset.

While parents have the best interests of their family at heart, trying to maintain a vacation home in the family for a number of generations can create a nightmare scenario. It makes good sense to discuss this strategy with qualified counsel and the family itself to make sure there is sufficient interest to maintain the family cottage for future generations and to properly structure the transaction.

The Importance of Regular Document Review

Many of my clients, after signing their estate planning documents, express with relief, “I'm glad we’re done with that task". Whenever I hear that statement, I remind my clients that, while executing documents is an excellent first step in the estate planning process, as their life changes, their documents may someday need changes, updates, or revisions. I suggest three primary events that should cause them to review and possibly update their estate planning documents:

 Substantial Change in the Value of Assets

An important goal of estate planning is to minimize or avoid gifting and estate taxes. As asset values increase, especially the point where a portion of the estate may be subject to estate taxes, it is critical to review documents to determine if the current strategies implemented are sufficient to achieve planning goals and to determine if different or additional strategies are advisable to protect against possible tax liability.

As assets increase, it may be advisable, or desirable, to take advantage of advanced gifting strategies for loved ones. This not only benefits family in the near-term, but also reduces the value of the future estate, thereby reducing estate tax liability. Certain gifting strategies also have an effect on income tax liability. By transferring income-producing assets to children or grandchildren, the income created by those is taxed at a lower rate due to the new owner’s lower total income.

In addition to reviewing an estate plan in regards to eventual distributions, as assets increase it is important to make sure additional assets are appropriately included in the trust property. Proper funding is important to achieve the second goal of estate planning, probate avoidance.

An increase in assets is not the only reason to review estate plan documents. If the value of assets decreases, it may be possible to simplify an existing estate plan by eliminating revocable trusts that are no longer necessary. Additionally, existing gifting plans may require review to ensure the existence of sufficient assets to provide for continued personal well-being.

Change in Family Situation

The family situation and dynamics are rarely stable, with many possible events creating a desire to modify an existing estate plan. Those events include,

1. The birth of additional children
2. The birth of grandchildren and a desire to provide for their future in addition to, or in lieu of, providing for children
3.  A special need arises with a child or grandchild
4.  A child demonstrates greater maturity earlier than anticipated, or perhaps demonstrates significant immaturity, raising questions about their ability to handle funds
5.  A parent or another elderly relative indicates a potential financial need
6. The need to remove an ex-spouse as a beneficiary following divorce
7.  In contemplating remarriage the need to ensure protection for both a new spouse and children from a prior marriage
8.  A significant change in personal health
9.  For any number of reasons, those people chosen to act as guardians for minor children, trustees, or persons designated to make legal or medical decisions in the event of incapacity are no longer appropriate choices.

These and many other naturally occurring family events require periodic review to make sure that estate plan documents reflect the changing situation and present desires.

Changes in the Law

Since 1976, almost every year has brought a modification to federal estate tax statutes. Case law is constantly evolving as the Internal Revenue Service litigates positions in opposition to strategies used by taxpayers to minimize or eliminate estate taxes. In addition, state law as it relates to probate, trusts, and powers of attorney and patient advocate designations has changed a number of times. Regular review of documents and the status of the law help ensure maximum estate tax and probate savings.

These three factors may have different relevance for clients with different situations. For an older client whose assets remain constant there may be little need to revise estate planning strategies for tax law changes, but it may be more important in the family dynamics change concern arises for beneficiaries with previously unforeseen issues. For younger clients with growing families and growing balance sheet, document review becomes important as assets approach taxable levels, or the birth of children creates an increased need for protection in the event the unexpected occurs.

Whatever the reason, it is important to be mindful that in order to provide maximum protection for loved ones and minimize potential tax liability estate planning must be an ongoing process. For younger families with rapidly changing lives, a review every three to four years, or perhaps even more frequently, is advisable. For families in more mature or secure situations, less frequent review is necessary. A good estate-planning attorney should provide guidance when there is a change in the law that affects existing documents, but since a client’s personal life rarely makes front-page news it is important to keep attorneys apprised of major life changes. This allows them to provide guidance and support that creates peace of mind from knowing that an estate plan continues to provide protection for loved ones.

Using an LLC in your Estate Plan

While trusts of various kinds are important in estate planning, other entities, standing alone or used in conjunction with trusts, are useful in achieving estate planning goals. One such entity is a Limited Liability Company.

A Limited Liability Company (LLC) is a business entity often used instead of a corporation or partnership. It is a hybrid entity that provides the benefit of limiting liability against personal assets for its owners (just like a corporation) as well as the benefits of being taxed for income tax purposes like a partnership.

By establishing an LLC with a "voting interest" component (typically 1%) and a "non-voting interest" component (99%) clients can give away assets, while maintaining substantial control over the administration of those asset during the client’s lifetime. The client (typically a parent) can keep the voting interest and give part or all of the nonvoting interest to children, grandchildren, or other beneficiaries. By retaining the voting interest, the parent maintains control of the operation of the LLC and the assets owned by it, yet is giving away value and future appreciation on the gift portion to others. I liken this to the client sitting in the front seat driving the car and his beneficiaries sitting in the backseat coming along for the ride. By giving away the majority of the non-voting interest during their lifetime (ideally using their Lifetime Gift Tax Exemption), the client reduces the total value of their estate and any potential Estate Tax liability. Another benefit of using the LLC strategy is a potential reduction in the client’s annual income taxes. If the LLC earns annual income, the LLC allocates that income in proportion to the owned interests. Thus instead of the client paying taxes on all of the income, the beneficiaries pay (presumably in a lower bracket) the tax on their share of the income.

The client can transfer any type of asset to the LLC, including cash. Transferring closely held businesses and real estate to an LLC provides additional planning opportunities:

1.    If structured properly, the LLC can take advantage of valuation discounts for minority interests and lack of control. In addition, assets such as real estate and closely held businesses tend to have a range of value rather than a specific value, and the client can take advantage of the lower range of the value in order to make more gifts under the Annual Gift Tax Exclusion or the Lifetime Exemption. It is important, if an LLC desires to take advantage of these valuation discounts, that a valuation expert determines the assets themselves and the valuation discount.

2.   Using an LLC offers the ability for business succession planning and provides a platform for determining who will operate entities in the future.

3.    An LLC provides protection against creditors, both for the client and the succeeding generations.

4.    The LLC offers an ability to plan for estate liquidity by purchasing life insurance in the LLC on the life of the client to eventually purchase the un-gifted client interests at the client's death or simply to replace the "client's wisdom and experience" with cash at death.

Clients can transfer an LLC interest as a gift to an individual or as a gift to a trust set up for the benefit of the individual. This is especially beneficial if a beneficiary has creditor issues, marital issues that may result in divorce, or spendthrift issues and an inability to control spending habits. In addition, gifting an LLC interest to a trust for the benefit of a minor allows for protection well beyond the minor's 18th birthday. The trust can specifically provide for income and principal distributions for the benefit of the minor with the eventual distribution at stated ages or certain events.

While the concept and use of an LLC for estate planning purposes is well-established, it is subject to IRS attack if not properly valued or if not appropriately established:

1.    The LLC must comply with all state law rules for establishing such an entity and must continue to maintain all the required documents. The LLC must be managed and operated as a separate entity and not just another "pocket of the client".

2.    With an LLC, the concept of "if some is good, more is better" is not necessarily a good idea. Clients should not transfer all of their assets to an LLC, because the IRS will argue that the client needs the LLC to maintain their lifestyle and therefore under estate tax rules the assets are deemed to be part of the client’s estate. Based on case law it is an especially bad idea to place the client's residence in the LLC.

3.    When making gifts, valuations are necessary to substantiate the amount of the gift. To the extent the gift is in excess of the $13,000 annual exclusion, a Gift Tax Return is required.

4.    Certain specific provisions must be included in the LLC to protect its integrity, ensure that gifts will be recognized, and allow gifts to be claimed as a "present gift" using the Annual Exclusion.

Use of an LLC for estate planning purposes is an excellent strategy in the right situation. It may be especially appropriate for any clients still interested in making large gifts before December 31, 2012 to take advantage of the $5,120,000.00 lifetime exemption, which may be going away in 2013. However, before taking any steps to include an LLC in an estate plan, clients should carefully review all tax and legal requirements with qualified professionals.

The Value of Annual Gifting to an Estate Plan

As we assist a client preparing their estate plan, we must be aware of a number of factors, one of which is a desire to minimize the amount of assets subject to the Federal Estate Tax. The Federal Estate Tax is the tax levied when the estate of a decedent transfers assets to beneficiaries. Currently the first $5,120,000 transferred is exempt from taxation (this is the “Estate” portion of the Estate and Gift Tax Lifetime Exclusion). The value of gifts (other than "Annual Exclusion" gifts which will be discussed later) that the decedent made during their lifetime reduces the $5,120,000.00 exclusion dollar for dollar (this is the “Gift” portion of the Lifetime Exclusion). After a person has exceeds the $5,120,000.00 mark, further gifting (either during life or at death) results in a tax liability. Keep in mind, each person has their own Lifetime Exclusion, so married couples can transfer  more than  $10,000,000.00 before incurring any tax liability, and the present law even allows a widow to use their deceased spouse’s unused Exclusion.

For most clients, knowing that they need to give away $10,000,000 before the IRS comes knocking is reassuring. It means that even if they succeed in accumulating a substantial estate, they can make gifts with little worry about paying anything extra in taxes. You likely remember however that the current $5,120,000 Lifetime Exclusion is scheduled to decrease to $1 million beginning in 2013. In addition, the top tax rate for gifts is scheduled to increase from 35% to 55%. If Congress does nothing and the default outcomes occur, this change will pace increased emphasis on clients addressing their lifetime gift planning now. Last week we addressed the possibility of making large lifetime gifts before the end of the year in order to take advantage of the current Estate and Gift Tax Lifetime Exclusion. It is important that clients look at those options before the end of the year. However, even if a client is not interested in making large gifts, the client can benefit loved ones by making gifts using another exclusion, the Annual Gift Exclusion.

The Annual Gift Tax Exclusion allows a person to make gifts of $13,000 or less to as many people as they desire each year, whether or not they are related, without incurring any tax liability and without using any portion of the Lifetime Exclusion. This means that a person with two children and four grandchildren could make Annual gifts of $13,000 to each of those people (totaling $78,000) without using any of their Lifetime Exclusion. As with the Lifetime Exclusion, the Annual Gift Exclusion is unique to each person, so a married couple can each make gifts to children and grandchild (using the example above a married couple can give away $156,000 each year without incurring any tax liability). While clients only should make such gifts if they are comfortable they have sufficient assets for their own  needs, a schedule of regular gifting can reduce the assets of person to the point where their estate has minimal tax liability.

For clients that worry that making substantially lifetime gifts will negatively effect their beneficiaries, due to concerns over addiction, problem marriages, or even a concern that the beneficiary will work less due to the Annual gift, additional planning can allay these concerns.

A primary tool to delay a beneficiary’s access to gifted funds is an Irrevocable Trust for the beneficiary’s benefit. The client makes the annual gifts to the Trust, thus limiting the beneficiary’s use of the gift subject to the terms of the Trust. Frequently, the terms of the Irrevocable Trust are similar to the terms of a client’s Living Trust, such that a beneficiary is able to request funds from the trustee for a limited number of reasons and then receives distributions of principal following the client’s death.

A gift to an Irrevocable Trust for a beneficiary must be a "present interest" in order to qualify for the Annual Gift Exclusion. This means that a beneficiary must have the right to immediately take possession of the gift and use the gift as the beneficiary pleases. However, by using a “Crummey Notice” a client is able to side step this limitation. As we have previously discussed while discussing Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts, a “Crummey Notice” informs a beneficiary of their right to withdraw the Annual gift for a limited period of time, otherwise that gift becomes part of the trust for the beneficiary’s benefit. Most beneficiaries are aware that future gifts may be conditional upon the beneficiary's willingness to let the "Crummey Notice" period lapse and allowing the gift to be held in trust. For minor beneficiaries “Crummey Notices” are signed by Guardians, thus for clients making gifts only to their own minor children, husbands may sign the “Crummey Notice” for the wife’s gift and vice versa.

An additional tool for gifting to minor children is the §529 Education Savings Plan. The primary advantage of a §529 plan is the earnings of the plan are not subject to Federal Income tax and generally not subject to State Income tax when used to pay for “qualified education expenses” including tuition, books, computers, and room and board. While contributions to such plans are not deductible from Income tax purposes, §529 plans do allow individuals to pre-pay up to five years of contributions in one year, which will count as gifts made in the current year and the following four years. Using the example above, the couple with four grandchildren can contribute $130,000 in the first year to a §529 plan for each grandchild, totaling $520,000). §529 plans are flexible and there is no penalty for changing the beneficiary from one family member to another or for combining §529 plans with the same beneficiary. When clients desire to provide for education of family members and have the  ability to pre-pay contributions, §529 plans are an excellent part of a schedule of regular gifting.

A final method of gifting involves the direct payment of medical care and tuition expenses. Using this method, a person may make unlimited payments, directly to a school or medical provider, for the benefit of another person. Gifts made in this fashion do not count toward either the Annual Exclusion or the Lifetime Exclusion. The Internal Revenue Service broadly defines the meaning of medical care to include not only diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of diseases but also payments for transportation to such care and payments for qualified long-term care services. Tuition gifts can pay for both private and public institutions and are not limited to college tuition, private primary and secondary school tuition is also payable. The key for a client making use of this method of gifting is making payment directly to the school or medical provider.

As we have said both earlier in this post and in discussing large lifetime gifts, before making any gift it is important to consider the consequences of that gift. Clients should consider the impact on their own lives, the chance that they will need the gifted funds later in life, and the impact on the beneficiary receiving the gift to determine if the benefits of gifting outweigh the potential consequences. Using the Annual Gift Tax Exclusions and the Lifetime Estate and Gift Tax Exclusion may require the filing of Gift Tax Return, and  making gifts to and Irrevocable Trust requires the existence of a valid trust, so clients should make sure to include their attorney and tax professional are a part of the planning process. Annual gifts are an effective way to pass assets on to future generations without the expense of additional tax liability. The sooner a client begins a regular gifting program, the more effectively they can make use of the process.